HEAVILY 70% 30% Tuesday, May 27, 2025, 10:16 am
The Supreme Court has opted not to review an appeal regarding a Massachusetts school’s decision to ban a student’s “only two genders” shirt, thus upholding the existing ruling. The decision, while steeped in legal technicalities, spotlights continuing tensions over dress codes and free expression in schools—proof that even clothing can ignite controversy.
The Supreme Court allowed a federal ruling to stand that found that a Massachusetts public school was justified in banning a student who wore shirts criticizing the transgender movement.
A federal appeals court upheld the ban despite a prior Supreme Court ruling, lawyers argued.
Los dos jueces conservadores, Clarence Thomas y Samuel Alito, señalaron que habrían revisado el caso del estudiante en Middleborough, Massachusetts, afirmando que los tribunales inferiores no estaban siguiendo la Primera Enmienda.
The Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to hear a student’s challenge after his school district blocked him from wearing a t-shirt that read “There are only two genders.”
US Supreme Court Rejects Appeal Over Student’s ‘Two Genders’ Shirt Bloomberg.com
Supreme Court declines to hear appeal from seventh grader who wore ‘two genders’ shirt to school CNN
permalink / 6 stories from sources in 5 days ago #supremecourt #culture #legal #education
Key officials and administration advisers double down on Trump’s tariff policy amid legal challenges and economic uncertainty. Remarks defending sharply increased steel tariffs and insisting on their permanence have sparked heated debate, with critics suggesting the move is as immovable as a stubborn trade relic. More...
Sources indicate that President Trump and President Xi Jinping are expected to engage in trade talks imminently. Although no fixed date has been announced, economic advisors suggest that the two leaders are poised to address ongoing trade tensions with significant global and political implications. More...
The administration’s move to revoke visas for Chinese students has ignited intense political criticism. Analysis of the policy’s potential fallout was matched by a sharp rebuke from a prominent lawmaker, who deemed the plan “terribly misguided.” The controversy underscores rising tensions over academic freedom and international relations. More...
Federal agents briefly detained a New York representative’s aide, prompting sharp criticism from key Democratic leaders. Accusations flew that the move was a politically motivated power play intended to intimidate opposition, leaving observers to ponder whether overreach has become the administration’s trademark. More...
Colorado authorities are treating the violent attack at Boulder’s Pearl Street Mall as an act of terror, investigating the incident that left multiple victims injured. The FBI and local police are under pressure to piece together this disturbing event, leaving the community both shocked and frustrated. More...
Supreme Court Greenlights Trump Immigrant Parole Revocation (2 days ago)
Supreme Court Curbs Environmental Review in Infrastructure Projects (3 days ago)
Court Halts Trump Tariffs, Upending Trade and Stock Markets (3 days ago)
Patti LuPone Faces Backlash Over Broadway Bullying Claims (32 hours ago)
Sydney Sweeney Calls It Quits With Fiancé, Embraces Single Life (35 hours ago)
Valerie Mahaffey’s Final Curtain (41 hours ago)
Stabbing at Salem Oregon Homeless Mission Shakes Community (2 hours ago)
Boulder Pearl Street Mall Terror Incident Probe (11 hours ago)
Trump tariff strategy faces legal and political firestorm (13 hours ago)
MIT commencement marred by controversial genocide allegations (2 days ago)
Faizan Zaki clinches victory at Scripps National Spelling Bee (3 days ago)
State Department Tightens Chinese Visa Policies, Expands Student Vetting (3 days ago)
Disclaimer: The information provided on this website is intended for general informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the content. Users are encouraged to verify all details independently. We accept no liability for errors, omissions, or any decisions made based on this information.